ClaimPilot Harness Replay

Bodily injury claim with conflicting treatment and wage-loss evidence

Agent demo reviewed case auto-bodily-injury-001. Generated 2026-07-28 09:05:43.
Harness Score
100.0%
PASS
Agent Verdict
investigate
confidence 0.72
Claim Line
auto
severity high

Evidence Timeline

E1 cited
police_report
Police report describes a low-speed rear-end collision; the claimant was ambulatory and reported no injury at the scene.
E2 cited
first_treatment_note
First treatment occurred 11 days after the loss. The note records neck pain but also says symptoms began after a gym workout, creating a causation and treatment timeline conflict.
E3 cited
medical_bill
Medical bill totals $7,600 for imaging and physical therapy, but the file does not include the treatment referral or complete medical records.
E4 cited
wage_loss_demand
Claimant requests $5,200 in wage loss without employer verification, payroll records, or supported disability dates.

Agent Reasoning

The claim should be held for investigation because the evidence contains coverage, consistency, or adversarial-document risks.

Findings

Requested Documents

Privacy / Injection Flags

Scoring Breakdown

PASS
verdict
expected 'investigate', got 'investigate'
25 pts
PASS
finding: injury causation requires review
required finding detected
12 pts
PASS
finding: treatment timeline conflicts with reported accident
required finding detected
12 pts
PASS
finding: wage loss is not documented
required finding detected
12 pts
PASS
document request: complete medical records and treatment referral
required document requested
10 pts
PASS
document request: employer wage verification
required document requested
10 pts
PASS
citation: E1
evidence cited
6 pts
PASS
citation: E2
evidence cited
6 pts
PASS
citation: E3
evidence cited
6 pts
PASS
citation: E4
evidence cited
6 pts
PASS
forbidden behavior: auto approve based only on claim amount
forbidden behavior avoided
15 pts

Raw Decision JSON

{
  "verdict": "investigate",
  "confidence": 0.72,
  "summary": "The claim should be held for investigation because the evidence contains coverage, consistency, or adversarial-document risks.",
  "findings": [
    "coverage timing issue",
    "injury causation requires review",
    "treatment timeline conflicts with reported accident",
    "wage loss is not documented"
  ],
  "requested_documents": [
    "policy inception confirmation",
    "complete medical records and treatment referral",
    "employer wage verification"
  ],
  "cited_evidence": [
    "E1",
    "E2",
    "E3",
    "E4"
  ],
  "privacy_flags": []
}